<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Twitter Spam Scam Uses Fake Celebrity RTs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/</link>
	<description>Blog Themes, Blog Design &#38; Daily Blog Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: miley cyrus upskirt</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-350352</link>
		<dc:creator>miley cyrus upskirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-350352</guid>
		<description>These factors make Twitter a big potential risk to both ones professional and computer security. Though anyone can always say something about you, on Twitter it is easy for others to say something as you and have other believe it. This is unlike email spam, which is very rarely seen and is almost never believed 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mileycyrus-online.co.uk/miley-cyruss-face-face-lift-or-botox.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Miley Cyrus&#8217;s Face! Face lift or Botox&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These factors make Twitter a big potential risk to both ones professional and computer security. Though anyone can always say something about you, on Twitter it is easy for others to say something as you and have other believe it. This is unlike email spam, which is very rarely seen and is almost never believed<br />
My recent post <a href="http://www.mileycyrus-online.co.uk/miley-cyruss-face-face-lift-or-botox.html" rel="nofollow">Miley Cyrus&rsquo;s Face! Face lift or Botox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Cowell</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-350351</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Cowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-350351</guid>
		<description>How on earth can this raise an issue about how safe Twitter is if you don&#039;t have any evidence to back up your claims?  
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/simon-cowell/~3/G8oynuwSsPY/joe-mcelderry-wins-the-x-factor-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joe McElderry Wins The X Factor 2009&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How on earth can this raise an issue about how safe Twitter is if you don&#39;t have any evidence to back up your claims?<br />
My recent post <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/simon-cowell/~3/G8oynuwSsPY/joe-mcelderry-wins-the-x-factor-2009" rel="nofollow">Joe McElderry Wins The X Factor 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web directory</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-350350</link>
		<dc:creator>web directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-350350</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s WAY to wide-open for abuse, follower spam, etc., and I am not creative enough to see how that can thwart that wave when it finally comes without fundamental changes to the whole way it works. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s WAY to wide-open for abuse, follower spam, etc., and I am not creative enough to see how that can thwart that wave when it finally comes without fundamental changes to the whole way it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-350348</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-350348</guid>
		<description>This is the first time I wanted to Digg something. And this is the first time I cant find the Digg button. That Murphy&#8217;s Law is such a nuisance sometimes   
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cheryltweedy/~3/-Qxwuhoq6OU/cheryl-cole-and-ashley-cole-granted-divorce&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cheryl Cole and Ashley Cole Granted Divorce&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first time I wanted to Digg something. And this is the first time I cant find the Digg button. That Murphy&rsquo;s Law is such a nuisance sometimes<br />
My recent post <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cheryltweedy/~3/-Qxwuhoq6OU/cheryl-cole-and-ashley-cole-granted-divorce" rel="nofollow">Cheryl Cole and Ashley Cole Granted Divorce</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-350349</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-350349</guid>
		<description>This is the first time I wanted to Digg something. And this is the first time I cant find the Digg button. That Murphy&#8217;s Law is such a nuisance sometimes   
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cheryltweedy/~3/-Qxwuhoq6OU/cheryl-cole-and-ashley-cole-granted-divorce&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cheryl Cole and Ashley Cole Granted Divorce&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first time I wanted to Digg something. And this is the first time I cant find the Digg button. That Murphy&rsquo;s Law is such a nuisance sometimes<br />
My recent post <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cheryltweedy/~3/-Qxwuhoq6OU/cheryl-cole-and-ashley-cole-granted-divorce" rel="nofollow">Cheryl Cole and Ashley Cole Granted Divorce</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retweet Changes and Twitter Plagiarism &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-332097</link>
		<dc:creator>Retweet Changes and Twitter Plagiarism &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-332097</guid>
		<description>[...] Indeed, the process does appear to be fairly automatic. Once you click the link to send the retweet and confirm you want to send it, the tweet goes out without any opportunity to edit. However, this also solves the problem of fake retweets being sent out using celebrities names, which became a major problem for a while in July. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Indeed, the process does appear to be fairly automatic. Once you click the link to send the retweet and confirm you want to send it, the tweet goes out without any opportunity to edit. However, this also solves the problem of fake retweets being sent out using celebrities names, which became a major problem for a while in July. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spam &#171; Kitten&#8217;s Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-331701</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam &#171; Kitten&#8217;s Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-331701</guid>
		<description>[...] There have also been isolated incidents, like when loads of legitimate accounts were hijacked, or fake celebrity re-tweets. Twitter is also definitely trying to minimize the issues of spam, although with mixed results, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There have also been isolated incidents, like when loads of legitimate accounts were hijacked, or fake celebrity re-tweets. Twitter is also definitely trying to minimize the issues of spam, although with mixed results, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zettieleeuwenburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329340</link>
		<dc:creator>zettieleeuwenburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329340</guid>
		<description>Thanks!!! for warning. Haven&#039;t heard about copycats in Holland, but better be warned! (Isn&#039;t Stephen Fry a darling to pass it on?) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!!! for warning. Haven&#39;t heard about copycats in Holland, but better be warned! (Isn&#39;t Stephen Fry a darling to pass it on?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329310</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329310</guid>
		<description>You can deny straight away. Just check Protect my updates in settings so you have to approve them before they see your updates. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can deny straight away. Just check Protect my updates in settings so you have to approve them before they see your updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parsley</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329298</link>
		<dc:creator>Parsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329298</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why this is a significant problem. Surely you&#039;re only going to receive these tweets if you&#039;ve opted to Follow the spammer at some point? If you use a bit of common sense when choosing who to follow it shouldn&#039;t be a problem. 
 
I know there are people who will follow anyone who follows them, but these are the same people who click on spam, phishing emails, etc. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure why this is a significant problem. Surely you&#39;re only going to receive these tweets if you&#39;ve opted to Follow the spammer at some point? If you use a bit of common sense when choosing who to follow it shouldn&#39;t be a problem.</p>
<p>I know there are people who will follow anyone who follows them, but these are the same people who click on spam, phishing emails, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jafafa Hots</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jafafa Hots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329293</guid>
		<description>I resisted using twitter for a long time, but in the short time I have used it it has become clear that unless they find a way to change things, its days of usefulness (such as it is) are numbered. 
 
It&#039;s WAY to wide-open for abuse, follower spam, etc., and I am not creative enough to see how that can thwart that wave when it finally comes without fundamental changes to the whole way it works. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I resisted using twitter for a long time, but in the short time I have used it it has become clear that unless they find a way to change things, its days of usefulness (such as it is) are numbered.</p>
<p>It&#39;s WAY to wide-open for abuse, follower spam, etc., and I am not creative enough to see how that can thwart that wave when it finally comes without fundamental changes to the whole way it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329292</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329292</guid>
		<description>I get people adding me all day everyday.  It&#039;s annoying on twitter how u cant just deny straight up. I just get an e-mail through on my phone saying so n so is following you and I have to go on my pc and actively block them to prevent them checking out my shit. They&#039;re always in the same format. &lt;a&gt;. 
 
I think however, if you&#039;re stupid enough to click on an absolute strangers link to something that sounds either too good to be true, or something irrelevant to anything u&#039;ve been talking about, you deserve it. 
 
To make sure you don&#039;t get caught out by these scams, click on the link below. It really works! &lt;a href=&quot;http://hackersanonymous.com/wegonnahackyou.suckers.pl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Http://hackersanonymous.com/wegonnahackyou.sucker...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
It&#039;s a safe site, just follow the link. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get people adding me all day everyday.  It&#39;s annoying on twitter how u cant just deny straight up. I just get an e-mail through on my phone saying so n so is following you and I have to go on my pc and actively block them to prevent them checking out my shit. They&#39;re always in the same format. &lt;a&gt;.</p>
<p>I think however, if you&#39;re stupid enough to click on an absolute strangers link to something that sounds either too good to be true, or something irrelevant to anything u&#39;ve been talking about, you deserve it.</p>
<p>To make sure you don&#39;t get caught out by these scams, click on the link below. It really works! <a href="http://hackersanonymous.com/wegonnahackyou.suckers.pl" rel="nofollow">Http://hackersanonymous.com/wegonnahackyou.sucker&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>It&#39;s a safe site, just follow the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alzinho</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329291</link>
		<dc:creator>Alzinho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329291</guid>
		<description>Seriously though, this gives absolutely ZERO concern over the security of Twitter specifically does it? I reached the same spam/scam whilst looking for a news feed when trying to find out what had happened at The Open golf championship today. Does that bring into doubt the security of Google, which gave me the link? As always on the intertron - if it looks too good to be true....it is! And you should leave it well alone. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously though, this gives absolutely ZERO concern over the security of Twitter specifically does it? I reached the same spam/scam whilst looking for a news feed when trying to find out what had happened at The Open golf championship today. Does that bring into doubt the security of Google, which gave me the link? As always on the intertron &#8211; if it looks too good to be true&#8230;.it is! And you should leave it well alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radge</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329287</link>
		<dc:creator>Radge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329287</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just realised your comment is actually a reply to &quot;Serafina&quot;. I initially thought it was a comment on it&#039;s own and didn&#039;t realise the error until I&#039;d posted, apologies. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve just realised your comment is actually a reply to &quot;Serafina&quot;. I initially thought it was a comment on it&#39;s own and didn&#39;t realise the error until I&#39;d posted, apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/07/16/new-twitter-spam-scam-uses-fake-celebrity-rts/#comment-329285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=8457#comment-329285</guid>
		<description>Oooo an intelligence for would be Tweeters. Very sensible and practical approach. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooo an intelligence for would be Tweeters. Very sensible and practical approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

