<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Removes Diggbar For Non-Digg Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/04/16/digg-removes-diggbar-for-non-digg-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/04/16/digg-removes-diggbar-for-non-digg-users/</link>
	<description>Blog Themes, Blog Design &#38; Daily Blog Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajeev Edmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/04/16/digg-removes-diggbar-for-non-digg-users/#comment-324841</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajeev Edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=6520#comment-324841</guid>
		<description>This is a welcome move by Digg. It&#039;s good to see that nowadays big sites listens to feedback and take appropriate actions. We saw same thing happening with Facebook, when they rolled back their new T&amp;C&#039;s after much hue and cry. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a welcome move by Digg. It&#39;s good to see that nowadays big sites listens to feedback and take appropriate actions. We saw same thing happening with Facebook, when they rolled back their new T&amp;C&#39;s after much hue and cry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Relents on DiggBar &#124; PlagiarismToday</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/04/16/digg-removes-diggbar-for-non-digg-users/#comment-324788</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg Relents on DiggBar &#124; PlagiarismToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=6520#comment-324788</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t think this is going to put an end to all of the controversy over the DiggBar, but if Kevin Muldoon&#8217;s post on BloggingTips (a site I also write for) is any indication, it has gone a long way toward mending bridges. Muldoon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t think this is going to put an end to all of the controversy over the DiggBar, but if Kevin Muldoon&#8217;s post on BloggingTips (a site I also write for) is any indication, it has gone a long way toward mending bridges. Muldoon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2009/04/16/digg-removes-diggbar-for-non-digg-users/#comment-324765</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=6520#comment-324765</guid>
		<description>This is certainly good news and, as you said, I don&#039;t think that they had much choice. When the backlash around the blogosphere is that strong a company can either listen and maintain goodwill or ignore the feelings of their loyal users and risk tarnishing their reputation and losing a large number of their supporters. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is certainly good news and, as you said, I don&#39;t think that they had much choice. When the backlash around the blogosphere is that strong a company can either listen and maintain goodwill or ignore the feelings of their loyal users and risk tarnishing their reputation and losing a large number of their supporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

