<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TLA InLinks Officially Launched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/11/20/in-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/11/20/in-links/</link>
	<description>Blog Themes, Blog Design &#38; Daily Blog Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare @ Top Christma</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/11/20/in-links/#comment-288429</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare @ Top Christma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=4339#comment-288429</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always steered clear of these sorts of programmes - A because I don&#039;t want to get in Google&#039;s bad books and B because I&#039;ve seen sites where the links point to completely unrelated products as the system cannot understand the context of the sentence you&#039;ve written. 
 
For now I&#039;ll stick to affiliates and adsense I think. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve always steered clear of these sorts of programmes &#8211; A because I don&#39;t want to get in Google&#39;s bad books and B because I&#39;ve seen sites where the links point to completely unrelated products as the system cannot understand the context of the sentence you&#39;ve written.</p>
<p>For now I&#39;ll stick to affiliates and adsense I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogosphere News / November 21st &#124; Blogging Tips from Blogsessive</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/11/20/in-links/#comment-287583</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogosphere News / November 21st &#124; Blogging Tips from Blogsessive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=4339#comment-287583</guid>
		<description>[...] BloggingTips.com: TLA InLinks Officially Launched [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BloggingTips.com: TLA InLinks Officially Launched [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archshrk</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/11/20/in-links/#comment-287436</link>
		<dc:creator>archshrk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=4339#comment-287436</guid>
		<description>Still trying to figure out how TLA and InLink are different but can&#039;t be used concurrently. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still trying to figure out how TLA and InLink are different but can&#39;t be used concurrently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/11/20/in-links/#comment-287388</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/?p=4339#comment-287388</guid>
		<description>I probably will not use inLInks because I find the practice of buying text links, foolish, at best. Here&#039;s why. 
 
Unless that text link bring you a ton of traffic on itself (unlikely), it&#039;s just not worth the money you&#039;re paying... If you just want to boost your SE rankings or PR, there are so many other ways to get links. Why pay? 
 
Outsource your link building efforts to India or something would get you a much better ROI. Do guest post. Link bait. The list goes on. 
 
It&#039;s so easy to do it the legitimate way, it&#039;s just not worth the risk of getting into Google&#039;s bad list. Of course, I do agree that Google is shooting its own leg by having that policy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably will not use inLInks because I find the practice of buying text links, foolish, at best. Here&#39;s why.</p>
<p>Unless that text link bring you a ton of traffic on itself (unlikely), it&#39;s just not worth the money you&#39;re paying&#8230; If you just want to boost your SE rankings or PR, there are so many other ways to get links. Why pay?</p>
<p>Outsource your link building efforts to India or something would get you a much better ROI. Do guest post. Link bait. The list goes on.</p>
<p>It&#39;s so easy to do it the legitimate way, it&#39;s just not worth the risk of getting into Google&#39;s bad list. Of course, I do agree that Google is shooting its own leg by having that policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

