The Reader Blog Criqitue was started around 2 and a half months ago. It has proved to be very popular and has generated some great ideas and suggestions for blog owners. One of the frequent commenters is Andrey Savchenko, more commonly known as Rarst. Rarst has participated in the critiques every week and his comments have been chosen as the best comment by several blog owners so I was intrigued when he offered to write a checklist for blog owners.
The following was wrote by Andrey Savchenko aka Rarst (subscribe via RSS Feed). He is currently taking part in Blogging Idol 2 so is offering guest posts and ad exchanges for free. Please contact him directly if this interests you.
Hope you Enjoy the post
According to numerous studies forming an opinion about a website takes seconds ie. opinion is as shallow as it is fast. If you are related to web publishing in any way then it’s very important to complement first impression with a methodical study.
A lot of publishers, especially in the blogosphere, have plenty of internet browsing experience. A lot of that influences their habits and preferences online. It may be hard for a blogger to distance themselves from their creation and evaluate its strong and weak points so it is handy to have an evaluation routine.
All blog critiques can be separated in two types:
There are some elements often missed in blog critiques simply because it’s difficult or impossible to see them.
It might be blog internal workings:
Or something you do not see or notice often:
Top of blog sets the tone. It determines:
Headers may serve different purposes. They can be aimed at anything ie sending visitors through to content as fast as possible. It’s important to determine if header design and content matches its purpose.
Information that is not tied to blogging timeline is usually put on static pages. Common experience is that they are linked from navigation menu in header and few same ones are on every blog:
There are two important things to check with static pages:
Post presentation can be done in different ways:
While classic looks are common it becomes easier to encounter magazine theme. Important thing here is that magazine themes are highly specialized. They serve best for blogs that need to highlight high amount of daily posts or variety of topics. Usage of magazine theme without purpose is a mistake to note.
If full posts are shown then it is important to check that vertical size and load time of page remains reasonable.
There is also different ways to handle post excerpts. They can be custom written, show beginning of post up to manual break point or be automatically generated. Usually anything is good as long as it’s not auto-generated.
Post pages are mostly associated with actual content but that is not the only important area here. Actually there are three:
Title and post are usually fine as long as they look nice and remain readable. But area after post is critically important and often overlooked. It is one of the best possible places for RSS link and exactly where reader starts looking for more when done with reading post. Some themes also show block of totally useless info here (trackback links and such).
Comments are fine as long as they are readable but blogs with high number of comments require more work here. Plenty of visitors look for blog author’s comments so it’s good practice when they are highlighted.
There are few rules here so sidebars are case by case. Widget overload is generally bad, rest can be very different. Some blogs have dynamic sidebar with contents different for different places (home page/post page/static page) so it’s worth to check for that.
Footer is another one overlooked area. It can be:
Same as sidebar – not much rules here. But there are often plenty of useless links here like "Log in" that should not be displayed and most common mistake ever – "©Copyright" which equals saying copyright twice. One must die.
Some blogs really like to stand out. They integrate dynamic services, make some elements appear only in specific conditions, use tools of bad fame (like pop-ups). In the end such uncommon elements are either:
It’s important to determine correctly which case it is.
Full round of critique is lots of time and lots of work. But in the end it all boils down to single summary:
I guess I’ve exhausted my list. Have something to add? More places you are looking into while performing blog critique? Tell me.
* This post was wrote by Andrey Savchenko of Rarst.
Author comments are in a darker gray color for you to easily identify the posts author in the comments
Comments are closed since this post is older than 30 days. However, you can continue this discussion in our popular Blogging Forums
I said this guy should do consulting work. He knows what he is talking about!
I enjoy reading all your articles if you check my site you will see you are on my list of recipients for the Kreativ Blogger Award.
This is only meant to thank you for the great effort you put in to help all of us.
Niels Henriksen
Thank you Rarst for this great checklist (already working with it on my blog)… and good luck with the contest.
@Kevin
Thanks for opportunity and sorry for my grammar. Is that “was wrote” in the end pun on me or something?
@Desk Coder
Thanks. I’ll consider Kevin for my manager if I get there – he seems good at organizing critiques. But have to pump my brand few (hundred) times larger before that.
@Niels
I think that was more to Kevin than to me. Thanks for liking my guest post anyway – now that it is part of this blog.
@Valeria
No problem, I like to be useful with my writing.
By the way of my Blogging Idol promotion is exchanging reviews. So if anyone is interested contact me.
A blog critique doesn’t really need to be that in depth lol. A viewer would usually just go in to see how things look and rate it on that. You can pretty much say, as long as they don’t know, they don’t say.
-Mike
@Mike Huang
This is not a description of process how readers treat blogs.
It’s checklist for indepth design review of your own (or not your own) blog.
These all tools are very nice and it is very useful to analyzes your site. Thank you very much for that.
@Rarst haha no that wasn’t a pun. It was a long article so it was just a reminder to readers that you wrote the post and not me
I am enjoying reading your website. I found your blog url from another wordpress blogger site. Your blog giving lots of information that I need, I will continue to visit your blog and learn more up-to-date blogging ‘trick’ before I start my own blogging.
Rarst, nice checklist. Handy for reviewers as well as bloggers just wanting to improve their own blogs. Thanks.
@Cheap used cars for sale
Glad that you find them useful. I’ve seen some cases when people started developing their own the,es and such without even knowing how to validate code so I try to include links for useful tools when I can.
@chubbypetsgarden
Again more to Kevin but since it’s under mine post I am still glad you liked it.
@Lyndi
Thanks. I hope it will help a bit those who hadn’t yet participated in Reading Blog Critique.
Great checklist Andrey and quite complete. You’re doing a great job on this series! It should prove useful to many, many bloggers out there. Of course, props go to Kevin too for the wonderful idea behind the series.
@Alex
I am glad that people with theme development experience find this checklist good.
Means I really got it quite complete.
Fabulous post! I printed this out and am critiquing my blogs one by one. Thanks!
@Chris
Glad you like it and good luck with improving your blogs.
There is always room for tweak to better.