PureNews

PureNews is an amazingly sleek and powerful news theme with unlimited color variations.

View full feature list Check out the live demo Buy this theme today

Analyse your backlinks with Backlink Watch

Posted by on 22nd Oct 2008 Software & Programs 19 comments

Steven Chappell posted about a useful backlink checking website yesterday called Backlink Watch. The site comes across as quite spammy as there are a lot of text links on the home page and a lot of banner ads at the top of the results page. And due to the volume of backlinks it gives you information on, it can take quite a while to load up the results.

However, I would still recommend checking Backlink Watch out. There are lots of backlink checkers on the web however BackLink Watch lists some info that most other online checkers do not (most good SEO scripts do provide this info though).

After you enter your URL it brings up the results page, which displays the total number of backlinks to your blog near the top. It then lists information about 1,000 backlinks.

Each backlink listing shows you :

  • Backlink URL – The URL of the page linking to you.
  • Anchor Text – The anchor text or image which was used to link to your blog.
  • PageRank – The PR of the page linking to you.
  • OBL – The number of outbound links on the page which is linking to you.
  • Flag – Any tag which has been added to the link to your blog.

It doesn’t seem to work perfectly though. In my report no PR figures were displayed. Also, out of the 25,000 backlinks BloggingTips apparently has, only 1000 were displayed. However, it isn’t clear which 1000 baclinks were chosen and why. Many of the links dated back to 2007 which makes me question how useful this is.

Nevertheless, the service does provide some interesting information. For example, at a glance you can see that the sites with more outbound links are sending you less PR than other websites which have the same PageRank, as they are spreading more PR juice around

I also think the flag column is useful as you can quickly see which links have the nofollow tag added to them. All of the nofollow links in my report came from comments on other blogs but this could be useful for catching out stingy linkers (ie. you link to them and they link back using the nofollow tag in the link).

Google Analytics is clearly a much better and much more reliable way of checking who is linking to you but with this site you can also check the backlinks of your competition and see what terms are being used to link to them. So it could explain why they are linking above you on competitive keywords in the SERP’s.

As I mentioned before, the report seems to be listing much older links for me, which is why I’m not raving about this as much as I think I should. However, it’s a free website and provides some useful info about your blog so I recommend checking it out.

Link : Backlink Watch *

* Website found via Monitor Your Backlinks With Backlink Watch

Kevin Muldoon is a webmaster and blogger who lives in Central Scotland. His current project is WordPress Mods; a blog which focuses on WordPress Themes, Plugins, Tutorials, News and Modifications and useful resources such as 101 Places To Find Images For Your Blog Posts.

19 comments - Leave a reply
  • Posted by Rarst on 22nd Oct 2008

    Bit slow. :) Took it few minutes to show 100 links… Out of 6000+ it claimed to find.

  • Posted by Robert on 22nd Oct 2008

    it is not too much slow i think.thanks for Backlink watch.it shows no follow or do follow.i liked it..

  • Posted by Mike Huang on 22nd Oct 2008

    Thanks for this wonderful tool :) I could definitely use this. I used to use prchecker, but it doesn't show other stuff besides the URL and PR.

    -Mike

  • Posted by B. Durant on 22nd Oct 2008

    Too slow and like you said GA is much better.

  • Posted by Rajeev Edmonds on 23rd Oct 2008

    Good tool, a bit sluggish though. But still a very useful tool.

  • Posted by Albert on 24th Oct 2008

    Do you know any good site that build back link "slowly"? so that will not penalised by Google?

  • Posted by Steve SEO UK on 24th Oct 2008

    You can't beat using the link: http://www.yourdomain.com for results.

    Notice I put a space between : and w. This works well for Google results.

    Thanks for the info though.

    Steve.

  • Posted by Child Safety on 24th Oct 2008

    Good tool! This is what I have been looking for! THANK YOU!

  • Posted by Confirm Links on 11th Dec 2008

    Nice tool little bit slow but very useful so slow will not be matter.

  • Posted by elite seo on 12th Dec 2008

    Nice tool, it displays 1000 backlinks only

  • Posted by display bannner on 10th Nov 2010

    Very nice tool,
    i have used this tool. This tool gives detail report about our domain back link information's like back-link URL , PR, OBL , and flag results but It takes more time to show the final results.

  • Posted by Trxbox on 16th Dec 2010

    Great post. Thank you.it displays 340 backlinks only
    My recent post Dead Space 2ye Bol Necromorphlu Fragman

  • Posted by anitya on 18th Dec 2010

    Good tool, a bit sluggish though. But still a very useful tool. thanks for information

  • Posted by Mike Nolls on 31st Dec 2010

    Absolutely a great tool. Definetely the best backlink checker utility in my opinion
    My recent post OC Home Prices Fell 23 in December

  • Posted by Castors on 17th Jan 2011

    I have use this tool it's really very great tool for checking back links and very clear result.

  • Posted by Web Redesign on 17th Jan 2011

    I have using many tools for checking back links but no one has true result but when i got backlin kwatch tools and check my every back link manually i got absolutely true result from this so now i can trust on this tools rally great tool here thank a lot for share backlinkwatch with us.

  • Posted by edward on 25th Feb 2011

    this well help me so much.

  • Posted by Best PTC sites on 21st May 2011

    thank you. this help me a lot
    My recent post

  • Posted by web design cyprus on 17th Jan 2011

    Great tool John. Thanks for sharing. The metrics are intersting indeed.