<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye 800&#215;600?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/</link>
	<description>Blog Themes, Blog Design &#38; Daily Blog Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Stars of the Week, March 31 &#124; Auburn Images Photography by Scott Fillmer</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-233462</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Stars of the Week, March 31 &#124; Auburn Images Photography by Scott Fillmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-233462</guid>
		<description>[...] Goodbye 800×600? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Goodbye 800×600? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: car-fan</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-232588</link>
		<dc:creator>car-fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-232588</guid>
		<description>As user (not programmer) I prefer liquid layouts with minimum width of about 800px. In home I have large display (30&quot;) but my laptop has only 1024 so liquid layout is the most compatible in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As user (not programmer) I prefer liquid layouts with minimum width of about 800px. In home I have large display (30&quot;) but my laptop has only 1024 so liquid layout is the most compatible in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-168126</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-168126</guid>
		<description>I use the images size as per my website needs and pages requirement, i never mind about size, but strictly follow the one rule for each and every images. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the images size as per my website needs and pages requirement, i never mind about size, but strictly follow the one rule for each and every images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Stars of the Week, March 31 &#124; a Blog by Scott Fillmer</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97148</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Stars of the Week, March 31 &#124; a Blog by Scott Fillmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97148</guid>
		<description>[...] Goodbye 800×600? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Goodbye 800×600? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: background checks bl</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97221</link>
		<dc:creator>background checks bl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97221</guid>
		<description>I have been using the 1024x768 for quite some time. I love having the extra space, and generally my sites target the more tech savvy type which tend use larger monitors. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using the 1024&#215;768 for quite some time. I love having the extra space, and generally my sites target the more tech savvy type which tend use larger monitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Fillmer</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97131</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Fillmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97131</guid>
		<description>I went for something in between so it would irritate everyone, around 1000x :) 
 
I just purchased a new laptop last week and the screen resolution is a whopping 1920 x 1200 and I can&#039;t wait to take a look at it.  I don&#039;t think I have actually looked at a screen 800x600 in years and years, so I think moving up is a great thing.  How in the world can you see anything on an 800x600 resolution anymore anyway? 
 
The mobile phone issue is different, but if you have an iphone it doesn&#039;t seem to make a difference most of the time what the resolution is designed to be.  I like the layout, thanks.  Scott </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went for something in between so it would irritate everyone, around 1000x <img src='http://www.bloggingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I just purchased a new laptop last week and the screen resolution is a whopping 1920 x 1200 and I can&#39;t wait to take a look at it.  I don&#39;t think I have actually looked at a screen 800&#215;600 in years and years, so I think moving up is a great thing.  How in the world can you see anything on an 800&#215;600 resolution anymore anyway?</p>
<p>The mobile phone issue is different, but if you have an iphone it doesn&#39;t seem to make a difference most of the time what the resolution is designed to be.  I like the layout, thanks.  Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce W</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97064</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97064</guid>
		<description>I still design for 800x600. Besides, the new ultra-portable laptops like the EeePC has breathed new life into the resolution since that is all they are capable of at this stage. I still think we should design for 800x600. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still design for 800&#215;600. Besides, the new ultra-portable laptops like the EeePC has breathed new life into the resolution since that is all they are capable of at this stage. I still think we should design for 800&#215;600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyn Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97048</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyn Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-97048</guid>
		<description>I think your site layout looks very clean and readable. 
I generally use free templates that I trust are compatible for the masses. 
AL </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your site layout looks very clean and readable.</p>
<p>I generally use free templates that I trust are compatible for the masses.</p>
<p>AL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Leschinski</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96908</link>
		<dc:creator>John Leschinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96908</guid>
		<description>Mobile devices should have either a separate style sheet, or a separate layout all together. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mobile devices should have either a separate style sheet, or a separate layout all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96858</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96858</guid>
		<description>With the rise in popularity of umpcs and browsing using mobile phones and other devices we may see an increase in browsing from lower resolutions. Though I would personally still design my blog with home users in mind and encourage mobile users to read the site via RSS </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the rise in popularity of umpcs and browsing using mobile phones and other devices we may see an increase in browsing from lower resolutions. Though I would personally still design my blog with home users in mind and encourage mobile users to read the site via RSS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lutz</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96806</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96806</guid>
		<description>I just had this very same conversation a few days ago on a forum I belong to. We even took a poll on all of our members and overwhelmingly our visitors were using 1024x768 and a few were higher than that. I think maybe we had 2 users still using 800x600. Almost everything I do is catered towards 1024 but I do still check across various resolutions and browsers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had this very same conversation a few days ago on a forum I belong to. We even took a poll on all of our members and overwhelmingly our visitors were using 1024&#215;768 and a few were higher than that. I think maybe we had 2 users still using 800&#215;600. Almost everything I do is catered towards 1024 but I do still check across various resolutions and browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramona Iftode</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96805</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramona Iftode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96805</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t design liquid layouts since I like to make them pretty graphical and this is a pain when having to stretch them. I also create most of my new designs on 950-980 pixels wide and not for the 800x600 res. anymore. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t design liquid layouts since I like to make them pretty graphical and this is a pain when having to stretch them. I also create most of my new designs on 950-980 pixels wide and not for the 800&#215;600 res. anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rina</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96715</link>
		<dc:creator>Rina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96715</guid>
		<description>Yes, even I agree that 800*600 resolution is not preferred any more. 
 
I have been doing lot of websites, and even I have started designing for 1024 screen resolution which means 950 pixels and fixed-width layouts! 
 
-rina </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, even I agree that 800*600 resolution is not preferred any more.</p>
<p>I have been doing lot of websites, and even I have started designing for 1024 screen resolution which means 950 pixels and fixed-width layouts!</p>
<p>-rina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Ebon</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96702</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Ebon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/03/29/goodbye-800x600/#comment-96702</guid>
		<description>I maintain websites and three blogs. In tracking the statistics on my users of some 30 sites, I, too, find that only about 4% are viewing at 800 x 600 pixels. 
 
Until recently, I&#039;ve been moving to liquid layouts. Of late, I&#039;m heading toward a fixed-width (950 pixels), as you have, to maintain a consistent layout for all users. 
 
I still seem to think it through on each project, but currently, I seem to come to the same &#039;fixed-width&#039; conclusion. 
 
Andy </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I maintain websites and three blogs. In tracking the statistics on my users of some 30 sites, I, too, find that only about 4% are viewing at 800 x 600 pixels.</p>
<p>Until recently, I&#39;ve been moving to liquid layouts. Of late, I&#39;m heading toward a fixed-width (950 pixels), as you have, to maintain a consistent layout for all users.</p>
<p>I still seem to think it through on each project, but currently, I seem to come to the same &#39;fixed-width&#39; conclusion.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

