<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality vs. Quantity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/</link>
	<description>Blog Themes, Blog Design &#38; Daily Blog Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: katykaka</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-246870</link>
		<dc:creator>katykaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-246870</guid>
		<description>Самое вкусное видео в сети, заходите будем рады  
видеть Вас на нашем сайте: &lt;a href=&quot;http://pornoworlds.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://pornoworlds.ru&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Самое вкусное видео в сети, заходите будем рады </p>
<p>видеть Вас на нашем сайте: <a href="http://pornoworlds.ru" rel="nofollow">http://pornoworlds.ru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datchnick</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-202996</link>
		<dc:creator>datchnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-202996</guid>
		<description>AeroHotels.ru - </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AeroHotels.ru -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Ramos</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6578</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Ramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6578</guid>
		<description>Different strokes for different folks.. 
 
It&#039;s very interesting to see the different blogging styles of bloggers  :smile:  
 
Thanks for the comments! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different strokes for different folks..</p>
<p>It&#39;s very interesting to see the different blogging styles of bloggers  <img src='http://www.bloggingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Thanks for the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tay</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6567</link>
		<dc:creator>Tay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6567</guid>
		<description>I think one of the things every blogger should try to master is having a high quantity of posts that are all good quality. Then the reader can have both. But if there could only be one, I think quantity is important. No one would visit a blog if it didn&#039;t have some amount of quality. And if I were reading a blog and they didn&#039;t post often, I wouldn&#039;t come back. 
 
Great post. :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the things every blogger should try to master is having a high quantity of posts that are all good quality. Then the reader can have both. But if there could only be one, I think quantity is important. No one would visit a blog if it didn&#39;t have some amount of quality. And if I were reading a blog and they didn&#39;t post often, I wouldn&#39;t come back.</p>
<p>Great post. <img src='http://www.bloggingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should You Focus on Quality or Quantity? &#171; Internet Marketing Blog by Noon-an-Night</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6551</link>
		<dc:creator>Should You Focus on Quality or Quantity? &#171; Internet Marketing Blog by Noon-an-Night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6551</guid>
		<description>[...] I did some searching around the internet for other bloggers&#8217; thoughts on this issue, and came across a great list from Blogging Tips: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I did some searching around the internet for other bloggers&#8217; thoughts on this issue, and came across a great list from Blogging Tips: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6565</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6565</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m leaning more towards quality. One interesting thing to consider is that quantity might actually overwhelm readers. I check Google Reader multiple times a day, but imagine a reader who only checks it every few days. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m leaning more towards quality. One interesting thing to consider is that quantity might actually overwhelm readers. I check Google Reader multiple times a day, but imagine a reader who only checks it every few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buxr Widget</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6552</link>
		<dc:creator>The Buxr Widget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6552</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on what stage your blog is in. If you are just starting out, you need high quality posts to get readers to come back. Once they start coming back, they need lots of fresh content. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on what stage your blog is in. If you are just starting out, you need high quality posts to get readers to come back. Once they start coming back, they need lots of fresh content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6540</guid>
		<description>Quantity - as long as it&#039;s uesful - over Quality. I try and blog every day and still get a bunch of visitors. I try and save my important posts for Friday, give them a weekend to generate feedback. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantity &#8211; as long as it&#39;s uesful &#8211; over Quality. I try and blog every day and still get a bunch of visitors. I try and save my important posts for Friday, give them a weekend to generate feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarkko Laine</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6537</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarkko Laine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/08/20/quality-vs-quantity/#comment-6537</guid>
		<description>Quantity over quality. 
 
Of course if there is no quality, there&#039;s no reason for reading the blog in the first place. But when the basic quality is in, I think you shouldn&#039;t work too hard in getting the absolute best quality imaginable. 
 
Okay, some posts aren&#039;t as great as others. But that&#039;s OK.  
 
Actually I think it&#039;s even better to write both great and &quot;not quite so great&quot; posts as that keeps the blog interesting. 
 
In some posts you can express a simple idea that reveals something personal about you and then in some other post you can work harder to polish your image as the leading expert. 
 
But if you only write posts that make you looking like the super expert, your text easily becomes too dry. It becomes more like a text book than a blog.  
 
I think a blog should have a feeling of &quot;life&quot; in it. It needs to be just a bit rough edged. Not too polished. Pro, but not too Pro. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantity over quality.</p>
<p>Of course if there is no quality, there&#39;s no reason for reading the blog in the first place. But when the basic quality is in, I think you shouldn&#39;t work too hard in getting the absolute best quality imaginable.</p>
<p>Okay, some posts aren&#39;t as great as others. But that&#39;s OK. </p>
<p>Actually I think it&#39;s even better to write both great and &quot;not quite so great&quot; posts as that keeps the blog interesting.</p>
<p>In some posts you can express a simple idea that reveals something personal about you and then in some other post you can work harder to polish your image as the leading expert.</p>
<p>But if you only write posts that make you looking like the super expert, your text easily becomes too dry. It becomes more like a text book than a blog. </p>
<p>I think a blog should have a feeling of &quot;life&quot; in it. It needs to be just a bit rough edged. Not too polished. Pro, but not too Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

