<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The perils of broken links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/</link>
	<description>Blog Themes, Blog Design &#38; Daily Blog Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueBoden</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-263598</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueBoden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-263598</guid>
		<description>The root-relative paths seams fine for links and navigation, but RSS would be better using an absolute path. 
 
Absolute and Relative Paths - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brugbart.com/Articles/115/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.brugbart.com/Articles/115/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The root-relative paths seams fine for links and navigation, but RSS would be better using an absolute path.</p>
<p>Absolute and Relative Paths &#8211; <a href="http://www.brugbart.com/Articles/115/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brugbart.com/Articles/115/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooliojones</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>cooliojones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>Johnathan is right on the money.  Also if you make any major changes to Wordpress, i.e. change your Permalink structure, tell the search engines any your readers in case they link directly to specific posts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnathan is right on the money.  Also if you make any major changes to WordPress, i.e. change your Permalink structure, tell the search engines any your readers in case they link directly to specific posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Street</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-3055</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 08:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-3055</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What can you do to avoid broken links?&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
 
- Preview your posts and check any links they contain before posting them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What can you do to avoid broken links?</p></blockquote>
<p>- Preview your posts and check any links they contain before posting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-3053</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingtips.com/2007/07/04/the-perils-of-broken-links/#comment-3053</guid>
		<description>The yahoo directory used to be notorious for listing sites that were no longer live. I bet they still have a lot of sites in the directory which are no longer updated or just dead. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The yahoo directory used to be notorious for listing sites that were no longer live. I bet they still have a lot of sites in the directory which are no longer updated or just dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

